(no subject)
Nov. 2nd, 2004 11:10 amI voted this morning before work. That's not too early in the morning to pick a president, but it was a little too early in the morning to think about legalizing baby abandonment.
I voted against directing my representative to vote in favor of a baby safe haven law for a couple of reasons. One is that, like the abortion debate, such an idea completely misses the point that if we put more effort into educating teens about how to not get pregnant (birth control and abstinence equally), it's likely that fewer of them would get pregnant. So I don't want to vote in favor of stop-gap issues, especially when I have serious doubts that the target audience for such a law would use the safe havens anyway. I think that people who might have kept their babies will be more likely to give them up as a result of this law. The other big reason is that a baby safe haven law would completely ignore the father's rights to his child, and I don't think that's right. On the same ballot, we had a question about whether in cases of divorce, each parent should be granted as equal access as possible to children, barring circumstances that make a parent unfit. It seems a little crazy to me that our state could declare that both parents have a right to their children's time in case of divorce, but that a father has no right to his child if the mother doesn't want it.
It's still hard to shake the feeling that I voted to put babies in the trash, though.
I voted against directing my representative to vote in favor of a baby safe haven law for a couple of reasons. One is that, like the abortion debate, such an idea completely misses the point that if we put more effort into educating teens about how to not get pregnant (birth control and abstinence equally), it's likely that fewer of them would get pregnant. So I don't want to vote in favor of stop-gap issues, especially when I have serious doubts that the target audience for such a law would use the safe havens anyway. I think that people who might have kept their babies will be more likely to give them up as a result of this law. The other big reason is that a baby safe haven law would completely ignore the father's rights to his child, and I don't think that's right. On the same ballot, we had a question about whether in cases of divorce, each parent should be granted as equal access as possible to children, barring circumstances that make a parent unfit. It seems a little crazy to me that our state could declare that both parents have a right to their children's time in case of divorce, but that a father has no right to his child if the mother doesn't want it.
It's still hard to shake the feeling that I voted to put babies in the trash, though.